Signal-to-evidence platform
The gap between operational truth and audit-ready evidence
Scan any domain. See what an auditor sees — DNS, email, TLS, and security headers in seconds.
The problem
You already run compliance seriously
The hard part isn't controls — it's proving they work. The gap between operational reality and compliance representation is where risk hides.
Reconciliation
Signals live in 5 systems, evidence lives in a spreadsheet. Every audit cycle starts with manual reconstruction.
Transformation
Raw config state doesn't speak auditor language. Someone has to translate operational truth into control-mapped evidence.
Regression
A passing control last quarter doesn't mean it passes today. Without continuous checks, drift goes unnoticed until audit day.
Temporal proof
"What was true on audit day" is a manual reconstruction. Point-in-time defensibility requires a ledger, not a dashboard.
How it works
Double-entry compliance accounting
Like financial ledgers: every control is a credit, every finding is a debit. Your balance is your posture — at any point in time, auditable by design.
01
Collect
Scanners pull technical signals from DNS, headers, TLS, and vendor APIs. No agents, no footprint on your systems.
02
Transform
Signals become evidence, automatically mapped to ISO 27002, NIS2, SOC 2, DORA, and more frameworks simultaneously.
03
Record
Every state change is journaled. Not a dashboard snapshot — a ledger entry with lineage. Credits for controls, debits for findings.
04
Enforce
Policies detect regression, freshness decay, and coverage gaps. Waivers are time-bound. Nothing slips through unnoticed.
Signal sources
GitHub
Slack
Google Workspace
GitLab
Bitbucket
Microsoft Azure
Notion
Jira
Vercel
Linear
Supabase
AWS
Google CloudReconciliation
Does reality match the policy?
Every ISMS has policies. The hard part is proving they're enforced. Sudory maps what the policy requires to what the systems actually do — continuously.
"Email must be protected against spoofing"
ISO 27002 — 5.14 Information transfer
"Data in transit must be encrypted"
ISO 27002 — 8.24 Cryptography
"Applications must restrict content execution"
ISO 27002 — 8.28 Secure coding
"DNS zones must be integrity-protected"
ISO 27002 — 8.20 Network security
2 of 4 policies fully reconciled — 2 have evidence gaps requiring action
Policy-as-Code
Compliance rules that enforce themselves
Define what "good" looks like. Every scan is evaluated against your policies automatically. Drift is caught in minutes, not quarters.
Versioned and auditable
Policies live in code. Every change is tracked with who changed what and when. Auditors see the exact rules that were enforced at any point in time.
Policy history
Multi-framework mapping
One policy can satisfy controls across ISO 27002, NIS2, SOC 2, and more. Write once, comply everywhere.
DMARC reject policy
Satisfies
Waivers with expiry dates
Exceptions are time-bound and approved. When they lapse, enforcement resumes automatically. No forgotten risks.
Active waiver
80 days remaining — then enforcement resumes
Coverage
What a single DNS scan proves
One scan maps to 6 ISO 27002:2022 controls across 7 frameworks.
5.14 Information transfer
SPF, DKIM, DMARC
8.9 Configuration management
DNS + HTTP header configs
8.20 Network security
DNSSEC, IPv6, NS records
8.21 Network services
TLS, HSTS, DANE
8.24 Cryptography
TLS, DNSSEC, DKIM keys, CAA
8.28 Secure coding
CSP, CSRF, cookie flags, X-Frame
Questions
Everything you need to know
Next step
See what your evidence chain looks like
We're not assuming there's a major gap. Let's find out together where signal-to-evidence conversion can become less manual.
Contact